Quick question...regarding sigs...how inappropriate...

[mommyofphoenix07]

do you think it would be to post signatures and the like in the galleries...non animated ones of course since I imagine it wouldn't display animated anyway...?

Just was wondering because I generally buy to make tags and signatures and what not?

[FlirtatiousBrat]

well..this is just coming from me being an extagger..

if they are general like hello, etc tags I don't think it would be a problem. Basically LOs on a white bg IMO. Now when it comes to artist work I'd leave those out probably. Not sure we need any Garv in the galleries lol

[ZaCola3]

Hummm...I never thought about it, I would suppose if you are using SSD stuff, and the tags aren't racy I wouldn't be an issue.
Man-I haven't made a tag in AGES! Over a year at this point!

[wildblueeyez]

Not sure we need any Garv in the galleries lol

:blink: LOL....ain't that the truth!! LOL

*ex-tagger too!* LOL

[ZaCola3]

LMBO-Yes, I would guess that Garv and the like would be exactly what I was thinking when I was thinking-appropriate...hehe.

[mommyofphoenix07]

Ah yes... I wasn't referring tothose anyhow...I meant more...hmmmm...ohoto tags. WhileI do love me some Garvs, those are too...impersonal...I just...well...here...lemme grab one I did a while back....

it's plain...and this particular one is not SS...but these...

http://i270.photobucket.com/albums/jj115/creativesigs/Mommy2Phoenix/TalanLookinGood.jpg

[scrapmonkey]

OK, I may be "out of it" but what are 'Garvs'?

[ZaCola3]

Ah yes... I wasn't referring tothose anyhow...I meant more...hmmmm...ohoto tags. WhileI do love me some Garvs, those are too...impersonal...I just...well...here...lemme grab one I did a while back....

it's plain...and this particular one is not SS...but these...

http://i270.photobucket.com/albums/jj115/creativesigs/Mommy2Phoenix/TalanLookinGood.jpg

That is cute!

Garv is an erotic artist!

[mommyofphoenix07]

heh. Yea. He's pretty popular in some sense...I'd say maybe more "MySpace" and such popular. I have quite a few but never really ended up using them. I know this sounds abrasive and I know I'm good at saying things that come off rudely without realizing it (or sometimes realizing and uh...just not caring) but...Garvey girls are more for those into doing tutorials, which, all good and fine. But, I know some girls who never advance in technique or really explore because they open the tutorial, do it and then change the name for everyone and use that as the premise of their talent and forget to actually learn technique. Kinda ruins the intent of a tutorial.

Though another board of mine uses them well! I love pin up signatures where they weave the girls onto letters.

[Julie Billingsley]

That tag you show isn't that different from a layout, in my opinion. :) It's adorable, by the way. :) Just stay in compliance with the gallery rules and I think you'd be fine if your example is acurate of your typical work... because if you said that was a layout then I think we'd all agree, even if it isn't the typical size of layout.

[Julie Billingsley]

here are the gallery guidelines in case you hadn't seen them-
http://www.sweetshoppedesigns.com/community/showthread.php?t=314

[mommyofphoenix07]

Oh yea. I mostly wanted to because I wanted basically to let people see that I'm not 100% digi hoarder. (Just 95%) A big part of my purchases is me saying to myself, well what if someone wants a signature done and THEY have a daughter? What if their kiddo is having a birthday? So...I do KINDA have a reason for buying! I use the elements a lot and the papers and such for my layouts. So, I'll maybe start posting a few things in the gallery, and before posting any signatures with other's photos I'll be sure to contact them and get permissions.

[Brooke W]

OK, I may be "out of it" but what are 'Garvs'?

Keith Garvey. He's a pinup girl artist and most of his work would be way, way, way too adult.