Sweet Shoppe Designs


Go Back   Sweet Shoppe Community > Candy Coated Conversation > A Sweet Little Community
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-07-2010, 05:57 PM
meems's Avatar
meems meems is offline
Jabber-Jawbreaker
 
profile gallery send pm
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,100
Default I need math help

Ok, people, I'm exposing my ignorance for all to see

I'm trying to help my son with his math homework. Apparently I do not understand the concept of distributive property. Well, I understand it in a vague sense. I just cannot apply it lol.

How would the following expressions be rewritten using the distributive property?

35 x 27
61 x 19
214 x 73
725 x 48

thx!
__________________
**Mimi**
I tried to make my siggy as fancy as possible without opening up Photoshop. This was the best that I could do.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-07-2010, 06:08 PM
lauren grier's Avatar
lauren grier lauren grier is offline
you're like stars
 
profile gallery send pm
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: mars.
Posts: 16,090
Default

i just googled. and it hurt my brain severely. me no likey math.

so you basically just need an equation with extra useless steps.. that equals the same on both sides yes?

so like..

ignore. my upside down equation.,

note i hve no idea if that's right.. but that's what i just took from what i read
__________________
~~La~~
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-07-2010, 06:13 PM
scrapperjade's Avatar
scrapperjade scrapperjade is offline
Sweet Talker
 
profile gallery send pm
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 3,675
Default

I have NEVER heard of distributive property before - what grade is he in??
__________________


Huge fan of:

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-07-2010, 06:17 PM
meems's Avatar
meems meems is offline
Jabber-Jawbreaker
 
profile gallery send pm
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,100
Default

he's in 4th.

La, I don't think your equation is right. but then again, what do I know?
__________________
**Mimi**
I tried to make my siggy as fancy as possible without opening up Photoshop. This was the best that I could do.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-07-2010, 06:17 PM
jessica31876's Avatar
jessica31876 jessica31876 is offline
Sweetsaholic
 
profile gallery send pm
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 10,658
Default

Me either Jaedyn
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrapperjade View Post
I have NEVER heard of distributive property before - what grade is he in??
__________________

Dreaming of creating for Cindy Schneider, Studio Flergs & Kristin Cronin-Barrow
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-07-2010, 06:18 PM
lauren grier's Avatar
lauren grier lauren grier is offline
you're like stars
 
profile gallery send pm
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: mars.
Posts: 16,090
Default

that would be because I didn't actually write the correct numbers LMAO.. dear lord.

eta 9x3 = 27... not plus.. LMAO
__________________
~~La~~
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-07-2010, 06:19 PM
newfiemountiewife's Avatar
newfiemountiewife newfiemountiewife is offline
Jabber-Jawbreaker
 
profile gallery send pm
Join Date: May 2007
Location: In the loony bin
Posts: 8,799
Send a message via MSN to newfiemountiewife Send a message via Yahoo to newfiemountiewife
Default

I just asked my kid, he's in 5th, and he never heard of it before. And since he's a math whiz, and I suck...I really can't help you
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-07-2010, 06:20 PM
lauren grier's Avatar
lauren grier lauren grier is offline
you're like stars
 
profile gallery send pm
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: mars.
Posts: 16,090
Default

actually....... wth. do i not know the difference btwn plus and multiply at all. I just woke up from a nap ^_^ im editing it out and not trying to re-write it
__________________
~~La~~
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-07-2010, 06:19 PM
scrapperjade's Avatar
scrapperjade scrapperjade is offline
Sweet Talker
 
profile gallery send pm
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 3,675
Default

If what La said is true then:

35 x 27 // (5x7) x (3x9)

61 x 19 // (6x10+1) x (3x6+1)

214 x 73 // (21x10+4) x (9x8+1)

725 x 48 // (29x25) x (6x8)

Maybe?
__________________


Huge fan of:

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-07-2010, 06:22 PM
lauren grier's Avatar
lauren grier lauren grier is offline
you're like stars
 
profile gallery send pm
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: mars.
Posts: 16,090
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scrapperjade View Post
If what La said is true then:

35 x 27 // (5x7) x (3x9)

61 x 19 // (6x10+1) x (3x6+1)

214 x 73 // (21x10+4) x (9x8+1)

725 x 48 // (29x25) x (6x8)

Maybe?
yes see. this is what mine would look like if i wasn't asleep.. BUT the thing i found had the left side broken up too /not in the original format... But i dunno if that's necessary?
__________________
~~La~~
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-07-2010, 06:25 PM
aggiefamily's Avatar
aggiefamily aggiefamily is offline
Sweet Talker
 
profile gallery send pm
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,948
Default

the definition is a rule that the same product results in multiplication when performed on a set of numbers as when performed on members of the set individually.

So yeah- it is just another way to write the problem by breaking up the factors into their own problems.
__________________
Amanda
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All Creative Content by Sweet Shoppe Designs © 2006 - Now

Making your memories sweeter

Copyright © 2016 Sweet Shoppe Designs – The Sweetest Digital Scrapbooking Site on the Web | Site by Lilac Creative